Skip to main content
City of Palo Alto sealPalo Alto Civic
  • Historic Resources Board

Historic Resources Board - January 8, 2026

Palo Alto’s Historic Resources Board narrowed a 159-project preservation awards list and will return in February to recommend recipients.

Historic Resources Board Regular Meeting video thumbnail

Listen to this AI-generated audio version

Awards candidates move to February review

The Historic Resources Board voted 5-0 to continue reviewing candidates for Palo Alto’s historic preservation awards and return in February with recommendations. The board did not select any award recipients.

Members said the original field of 159 projects had been reduced to roughly 40 overall, with 18 projects discussed during the meeting. They added 165 Channing, 951 Channing and 345 Cridge to the working list while removing 575 Hawthorne and 325 Melville.

Among the properties discussed, members identified 450 Bryant Street, the former fire and police building, as a strong rehabilitation candidate. They also considered residential projects at 512 Cowper, 755 Hamilton, 840 Kipling and 1040 Ramona. Members suggested holding 1023 Forest for a later award cycle because its work was not complete and requested more information about work at the Junior Museum and Zoo at 1451 Middlefield.

Staff will circulate the reduced list, and board members plan to research permits, plans and project conditions before recommending candidates and award categories in February. The awards program has nine categories, and the board plans to identify at least nine potential recipients.

Members seek clearer Council briefings after Bryant case

Side-by-side Street View and map showing the captioned location labeled B

1680 Bryant Street

Board members also revisited the City Council’s Dec. 15 decision granting the applicant’s requested historic-category downgrade for 1680 Bryant Street. The board took no new action on the property.

Members said the Council received information that was not part of the board’s record and that the staff summary did not fully convey the board’s reasoning. They discussed providing better notice when a Council matter changes from a consent item to a discussion item and giving the Council a more complete explanation of the board’s rationale. Staff said it would work to improve those notices and summaries.

Primary sources

Watch the meeting on YouTube · Read the official meeting agenda

Comments

You may comment anonymously.