Skip to main content
City of Palo Alto sealPalo Alto Civic
  • Human Relations Commission

Human Relations Commission - September 11, 2025

Palo Alto’s draft CDBG report shows $793,516.08 in fiscal-year spending as the city discusses transition support for a downtown food closet.

Human Relations Commission Regular Meeting video thumbnail

Listen to this AI-generated audio version

Draft report accounts for $793,516 in block-grant spending

Side-by-side Street View and map showing the captioned location labeled A

Alma Street, Palo Alto, CA

The Human Relations Commission reviewed, but did not act on, a draft annual report showing $793,516.08 in Community Development Block Grant expenditures during fiscal 2024-25. About $1.11 million was available, including $513,653 in federal entitlement funds, $129,950 in program income and $464,154.61 left unspent from prior years. The stated deadline for public comments on the draft CAPER was Sept. 24, 2025, before its planned submission to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development by Sept. 30.

Among the reported results, Alta Housing provided counseling and case management to 516 residents, LifeMoves served 47 residents, and the Silicon Valley Independent Living Center assisted 24 adults with disabilities. The program also funded 43 curb ramps estimated to benefit 6,681 people with disabilities and assisted two households through Rebuilding Together Peninsula. Staff said all public-service awardees fully spent their grants.

The 10-unit Alma Garden rehabilitation had completed exterior work and begun interior work. Staff also clarified that the CDBG-funded portion of Project Homekey is a playground. That work remained in predevelopment during a federal environmental review, with construction anticipated in the following months.

Commissioners pressed for more inclusive outreach and stronger evidence of longer-term outcomes. Katie Causey asked how the city reaches non-English-speaking residents, families with children and people with disabilities, while Marykate Stimmler asked about spending details, project schedules and the outlook for federal CDBG support. Staff said providers may track individual histories, but longitudinal outcomes are not a CDBG or HUD reporting requirement and are not currently collected through the program. Staff planned to emphasize city outreach channels during the next funding round and follow up on city advocacy for continued federal funding.

Staff prepare food-closet transition update as Downtown Streets Team closes

City staff said Downtown Streets Team is closing and that the city and nonprofit partners were discussing transition support, including how to maintain the downtown food closet. No transition decision was reported. Staff expected to provide an update by the commission’s next meeting, rescheduled for Oct. 16, 2025.

Commission explores community ownership without recommending a policy

Side-by-side Street View and map showing the captioned location labeled B

Reed Street, downtown San Jose

The Human Relations Commission made no recommendation after an early-stage learning session on community land trusts, limited-equity cooperatives, social housing and other acquisition-and-preservation models. Katie Causey, who convened the discussion, raised the need to help surrounding neighborhoods understand and support such approaches. Organizers said they planned to use the session in later conversations with city staff.

Examples highlighted the cost and organizational demands of community ownership. Mountain View approved $4 million in seed funding for a community-ownership framework in March 2024; meeting materials cited an updated estimate of $25 million to preserve 50 units. The South Bay Community Land Trust described a $500,000 grassroots-funded initial loan down payment for its Reed Street acquisition and financing that included $5 million in San Jose Measure E funds and $4.5 million in BAF 2.0 funds for the 18-unit Virginia Apartments.

Presenters said tenant- or community-opportunity-to-purchase rules can slow property sales and require substantial acquisition funding and organizational capacity. Mountain View had not recommended such a policy, citing insufficient funding and local capacity. The discussion also identified uncertainty over accessibility, seismic and other code obligations when older buildings are acquired for rehabilitation. No Palo Alto funding proposal was presented.

Library discussion opens door to collaboration amid funding pressures

Side-by-side Street View and map showing the captioned location labeled C

Mitchell Park Community Center, Palo Alto, CA

The commission took no formal action after hearing an overview of Palo Alto library services and discussing possible collaboration on cultural programming, immigrant resources and connections for vulnerable patrons. Library staff invited commissioners to share referrals, needs and ideas. Members suggested future outreach to Project Homekey residents after the facility opens, but gave no formal direction.

Staff reported 748,967 visits to library facilities and more than 1 million website visits in fiscal 2025. The library system offered more than 1,000 programs and events in the prior year, drawing more than 43,000 attendees; Nowruz was the largest cited event, with 780 attendees. Staff identified finite operating resources across five libraries, reduced federal funding flowing through the State Library and pressure to add AI-related services while maintaining core operations.

Primary sources

Watch the meeting on YouTube · Read the official meeting packet