- Planning and Transportation Commission
Planning & Transportation Commission - February 11, 2026
Palo Alto’s planning commission voted 3-2-1 to recommend denial of a parcel map tied to a proposed 321-unit El Camino Real project.

Listen to this AI-generated audio version
Commission urges denial of El Camino parcel map over safety concerns

3606 El Camino Real, Palo Alto, CA
The Planning & Transportation Commission recommended that the City Council deny a vesting tentative map for 3606 El Camino Real in a 3-2-1 vote. The majority concluded that a required subdivision finding could not be made because of potential serious public-health and safety problems for bicyclists and pedestrians on Safe Routes to School. The map would merge seven parcels into one 113,907-square-foot, approximately 2.61-acre lot to facilitate a separate proposal for 321 residential units.
The commission’s review was limited to the parcel merger, not the separate development entitlement. Staff recommended approval, saying the resulting parcel would comply with city code and provide sidewalk and utility easements, including an effective 12-foot sidewalk along El Camino Real.
Commissioners Cari Templeton, Bryna Chang and Kevin Ji supported denial, citing insufficient transportation and safety information about access and circulation on Kendall and Matadero avenues. Bart Hechtman argued that the disputed finding should be interpreted narrowly around the subdivision and its improvements; he and Allen Akin opposed the denial recommendation. Forest Peterson abstained.
An earlier motion to recommend approval with additional requests for City Council consideration failed. The final denial recommendation carried those requests forward, including consideration of a transportation study, public sidewalk easements, relocated vehicle access and bicycle paths incorporating parts of the property. Staff said the applicant would be required to complete a transportation study and that, if it is not finished before council action, compliance with its recommendations would become a condition of approval. The City Council will consider the map and associated development application.
Laurel Glen home advances with lighting and bird-safety requests

929 Laurel Glen Drive, Palo Alto, CA
The commission voted 6-0 to recommend City Council approval of a major site and design application for a new two-story home at 929 Laurel Glen Drive, subject to staff conditions. The proposal covers a 4.23-acre vacant site and includes a residence and attached three-car garage totaling 6,581 square feet.
The commission strongly recommended that the applicant coordinate exterior colors with neighbors to reduce the home’s visual prominence, follow the city’s new dark-sky standards for exterior lighting, consider limiting interior light spill and mitigate hazards to birds from glass guardrails and large glazing areas. Those points were recommendations rather than new conditions: the dark-sky ordinance does not automatically apply because of the application’s completion date, and a bird-friendly design ordinance had not been adopted.
Staff said construction would remove 15 native oak trees, including 14 protected trees, requiring 60 replacement native oaks. Sensitive habitat and high-fire-severity constraints could result in a combination of on-site planting and in-lieu fees. Staff indicated that City Council consideration was likely in April.
Commissioners press for regular transportation and crossing-safety updates

Cubberly Community Center
Commissioners pressed for more regular access to transportation staff after being told that Transportation Department representatives were expected to attend one commission meeting per month rather than every meeting. No formal action was taken.
Cari Templeton objected to the reduced attendance and requested updates on railroad-crossing discussions and opportunities for commission and public input. Kevin Ji and Forest Peterson supported regular transportation participation, while Bart Hechtman suggested brief written updates when staff cannot attend, acknowledging staffing and budget constraints.
Staff said it would relay the requests to the Office of Transportation and coordinate with personnel working on urgent railroad-crossing safety matters to determine whether an item should come before the commission. Staff also said some urgent improvements could proceed through an emergency path.
In separate comments, Templeton raised the City Council-directed Churchill Road crossing closure and encouraged attention to safety improvements at other crossings, including Charleston and Meadow. Peterson noted a student-initiated petition seeking a crossing guard at the Churchill Road crossing near the high school. The commission took no action on those requests.
Primary sources
Watch the meeting on YouTube · Read the official meeting packet