City project
Palo Alto Commons
Expansion and related modifications to the existing Palo Alto Commons assisted living and memory care facility.
- Current status
- Proposed 13-unit expansion under public comment.
- Location
- El Camino Way, Palo Alto, CA
May 11, 2026 update: grand opening announced
Council announcements reported the project’s grand opening and described its affordable housing for adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities.
Read related coverageApril 20, 2026 consent-calendar public comment
Consent-calendar commenters supported the staff recommendation to decline adoption on second reading, citing the Council's prior unanimous seven-unit compromise on March 16 and the extended hearing process.
Read related coverageMarch 16, 2026 expansion deliberation
Council debated an 11-unit expansion versus the PTC-recommended seven-unit alternative, with conditions concerning parking, annual monitoring, and historic planned-community commitments.
Read related coverageJanuary 15, 2026 Architectural Review Board recommendation
The Board considered the revised design, including duplex units, a muted material palette, terraced retaining walls, rooftop-deck lighting details, playgrounds, and a community garden, and recommended City Council approval.
Read related coverageDecember 16, 2025: Park Improvement Ordinance recommendation
The Commission recommended approval of the associated Park Improvement Ordinance, contingent on a City commitment addressing Baylands-specific species, canopy, and ecological value near affected trees.
Read related coverageSeptember 24, 2025 revised expansion proposal
Staff presented a revised proposal for 13 additional assisted-living units and 172 square feet of support space, reducing the earlier 16-unit proposal by three third-floor units. The proposal includes site improvements, landscaping, exterior color changes, a parking plan, and a transportation demand management plan. Public comment opposed exterior-facing units and raised parking, daylight, privacy, and compliance concerns. The applicant defended a 13-unit concept, stated the two third-floor units are angled and 25 feet from the property line, and agreed to prohibit staff parking on nearby streets. Commissioners continued deliberation. Commissioners discussed unit count, daylight-plane compliance, neighborhood impacts, parking management, and transportation-demand-management conditions.
Read related coverageMay 27, 2025 Council discussion
Council discussed a reduced seven-unit alternative, TDM compliance, parking, privacy, daylight-plane standards, and occupancy preference conditions.
Read related coverageMay 5, 2025 hearing continued
Staff presented a proposed planned-community amendment for 16 additional assisted-living and memory-care units and associated site changes. Following extensive public comment, the Council continued the hearing without setting a return date.
Read related coverageMay 1, 2025: City Council scheduling discussion
The board discussed whether a representative should attend the City Council meeting because the board had recommended approval and the PTC had expressed a different view.
Read related coverageApril 30, 2025: City Council review scheduled
Staff identified Cari Templeton as the May liaison and requested availability to attend remotely and answer questions.
Read related coverageFebruary 20, 2025 discussion of pending builder's remedy application
The Board discussed preliminary concerns but took no project action because the application had not yet been presented. Staff stated the project would proceed through Architectural Review Board and Planning Commission recommendations before a City Council decision.
Read related coverageDecember 19, 2024 Board discussion
The Board discussed a reported Planning and Transportation Commission recommendation to move the project forward with fewer units. Board members supported the project as previously approved by the Board and requested that City Council receive the Board's input.
Read related coverageDecember 11, 2024 modified-approval recommendation
The commission recommended limiting the amendment to seven additions not facing Wilky Way, excluding nine Wilky Way-facing units and new Wilky Way-facing office additions; it also requested further commission review of the TDM.
Read related coverageOctober 17, 2024 ARB recommendation
The Board considered revisions addressing screening, window privacy, parking and transportation demand management, noise, and exterior colors, then recommended approval to City Council.
Read related coverage
Comments
You may comment anonymously.